Michigan's Legislative Dynamics to Change: Implications for the Life Sciences Industry

January 22, 2025

Bipartisan Cooperation Key as Power Balances Reshape Policy Direction

One party control of the legislature and executive office came to end as an outcome of the November 2024 election. Republicans flipped enough seats to give them a 58-52 majority in the Michigan House for the next two-year term. In the Senate, the Democrats will hold only a one seat majority due a vacancy opening up with one of their members being elected to Congress.

 

So, expect much of what is likely to pass the Michigan Legislature to be nonpartisan. With slim margins in the House and Senate, meaningful movement on high-profile issues will require dealmaking that makes sense to members of both parties – something that hasn’t been witnessed in some years. It won’t easy nor quick, but here’s hoping that checks and balances will be sufficiently in place to at least move some things forward.

 

It’s expected that Republican control of the House should, at a minimum, emphasize fiscally responsible, pro-growth reforms. State lawmakers appear poised to push through some changes to paid sick leave laws set to take effect on February 21, 2025, following a Michigan Supreme Court ruling. The specific changes that survive the legislative process, if any, remain to be seen and most likely will not become finalized until after the state’s sweeping changes take effect next month.

 

In the Senate, Democrats will continue to pursue ill-conceived legislation that targets drug manufacturers rather than PBMs and insurers to lower out-of-pocket drug costs. Indeed, bills to establish so-called Prescription Drug Affordability Boards have been reintroduced in the Senate. Similarly, legislation requiring drug manufacturers to provide products to contract pharmacies participating in a 340B program without conditions or limitations is expected to be reintroduced, thereby altering a federal program at the state level.

 

In other policy areas, MichBio expects that Democrats will make attempts once again to restrict, if not, prohibit the use of animals in research, though such legislation is unlikely to gain much traction, certainly not in the House. Also, a Data Privacy Act will be reintroduced, though if written as passed by the Senate in the last session, it will not impede the sharing and disclosure of patient clinical data in research and between collaborators/partners – an exemption that MichBio and AdvaMed garnered over the last fifteen months.

 

MichBio is currently developing its state policy priorities for 2025. Now that a state R&D tax credit has been reestablished, it’s likely our emphasis will turn to other measures that can catalyze capital investment in early-stage ventures, reshore manufacturing, and expand bioscience workforce-specific training programs.

 

It’ll take plenty of educating legislators about our life sciences industry before we can convince them to support favorable policies. A first step will be the upcoming Legislative Welcome Reception set for January 28 in Lansing. Attendance is limited to MichBio members and sponsors – contact us at stephen@michbio.org to learn more.

RECENT ARTICLES

April 24, 2025
Prenuptial Patenting: Responsible Engagement with Engineering Firms
April 24, 2025
PharmOptima, a Poratge, Michigan-based preclinical contract research organization (CRO) is advancing drug discovery through its comprehensive suite of services. Specializing in in-vivo ADME/PK, ocular research, as well as regulated large and small molecule bioanalytical and ligand binding services, PharmOptima supports clients in optimizing drug development programs efficiently and effectively. With a staff averaging 11 years of industry experience and multiple individuals with advanced degrees, PharmOptima also boasts one of the most capable and engaging teams in the industry. The company collaborates with board-certified veterinary ophthalmologist Dr. Ryan Boyd, further enhancing its ocular research capabilities. PharmOptima's team of experts is dedicated to providing high-quality services to the pharmaceutical biotechnology industries. Looking ahead, PharmOptima scientists will be presenting posters at the 2025 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) conference, showcasing their latest research and innovations in ocular drug development. For more information visit www.pharmoptima.com .
April 24, 2025
Two bills, HB 4332 and HB 4333 were recently re-introduced that would prohibit pathogen gain-of-function (GoF) research. Given that the House is now Republican-led raises concerns for MichBio and others that the legislation might gain traction due to misinformation over biosafety and pandemic origins. MichBio opposes such broad legislative bans as they risk undermining critical scientific progress, public health preparedness, and economic innovation. GoF research has been instrumental in developing life-saving therapies and vaccines. For instance, viral vector-based gene therapies, such as Sarepta's Elevidys for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and oncolytic virotherapies like Amgen's Imlygic for melanoma, rely on genetically modified viruses to deliver therapeutic genes or selectively destroy cancer cells. These advancements stem from GoF methodologies that enhance viral capabilities for therapeutic purposes. Moreover, GoF research has played a pivotal role in vaccine development. Examples like the AstraZeneca and Janssen COVID-19 vaccines and Merck's ERVEBO vaccine against Ebola employs a genetically modified virus to confer protection, underscore the public health benefits derived from GoF studies. ​ Contrary to concerns that GoF research operates without sufficient oversight, multiple layers of regulation are in place. Since 2017, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has implemented a framework to evaluate and guide funding decisions for GoF research, particularly those involving potential pandemic pathogens. This framework includes stringent safety protocols, risk assessments, and ethical reviews. ​ MichBio is most concerned that any legislative bans that broadly define and prohibit GoF research risk stifling innovation across various scientific fields. Such bans could inadvertently encompass research in virology, microbiology, molecular biology, and synthetic biology—disciplines vital for developing new therapies, sustainable agricultural practices, and environmental remediation technologies. ​ In turn, state-level bans on GoF research could have detrimental effects on local economies and academic institutions. Such a ban could impede research critical to understanding and combating diseases, leading to a loss of federal and philanthropic funding. This could hamper the growth of the Michigan's biotech and biomedical sectors. ​  MichBio advocates for a balanced approach that reinforces existing oversight mechanisms and fosters transparent, responsible research practices essential to safeguard both public health and scientific progress.