NIH Indirect Cost Cuts Risks U.S. Leadership in Life Science Innovation

March 4, 2025

How NIH Funding Cuts Could Undermine U.S. Life Science Innovation

On February 7, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced a 15% across-the-board reduction in indirect funding allocations. Indirect costs are devoted to sustaining the administrative and personnel expenses necessary for laboratories at universities to conduct basic research and function. An excellent article in Science speaks to the matter. 


MichBio issued a [public statement] decrying the proposed cuts as an assault on the innovation economy, and one that would threaten U.S. leadership in biomedical research and discovery, and inevitably reverberate from academia to the private sector. An order blocking  the Trump administration from implementing the cap on indirect costs has been extended indefinitely. 


In addition, MichBio has partnered with other state and national groups on the issue, including a statement issued by the Council of State Bioscience Association (CSBA)


Most notably, so-called “red states” have pushed back on the proposed NIH cuts noting pursuing them would be devastating to public institutions that are widely regarded as economic engines in their regions. MichBio joined several of those states in issuing [a letter] to be distributed to our respective Congressional delegation offices. 


MichBio continues to connect with Michigan institutions and organizations impacted by this funding cut to best understand the full ramifications to research and innovation. 


Please reach out to Stephen Rapundalo, Ph.D., President and CEO, with any insights regarding the impact of this announced cut to research and training functions. 

RECENT ARTICLES

April 15, 2025
MichBio seeks a highly motivated individual who can work creatively in a small team environment and assist in data mining, compilation, and research.
April 11, 2025
The Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO), of which MichBio is a state affiliate recently released the results of a survey of its members, noting that “U.S. Biotechs Sound the Alarm” on tariff impacts. The findings include: Tariffs on European Union and Canadian imports would increase manufacturing costs for 94% and 82% of biotech firms, respectively. 70% of companies anticipate higher manufacturing costs due to tariffs on China. Tariffs on the European Union would force 50% of biotech firms to identify new research and manufacturing partners. More than 50% of biotech firms predict “increased difficulty” in funding and conducting research if EU tariffs are enacted. 80% of biotech firms would need at least 12 months to find alternative suppliers; 44% would need over two years. The survey noted that sudden tariffs would fundamentally punish American companies, threaten vital research projects and imperil United States leadership in biomedical science. Read BIO’s press release , along with an one-pager summarizing the survey results. 
April 10, 2025
A federal commission, in a new report , is calling for $15 billion in new financing to reinforce the United States’ biotech leadership amid encroaching competition from China. This comes against a backdrop where the Trump Administration has proposed severe cuts to NIH operations and funding. The National Security Commission on Emerging Biotechnology was created by Congress in 2022 to explore how biotechnology advancements could shape the economy and national security. The body quickly focused on China, as that government has gone about gathering Americans’ genetic information and intellectual property in the biotech space and resourcing their cluster’s rapid growth. The report’s 49 recommendations, organized across six strategic pillars, offer a bold and actionable framework to protect U.S. biotech intellectual property and bolster drug development, agriculture, and biological weapons defense: Prioritize biotechnology at the national level Mobilize the private sector to get U.S. products to scale Maximize the benefits of biotechnology for defense Out-innovate our strategic competitors Build the biotechnology workforce of the future Mobilize the collective strengths of our allies and partners The report calls for $1 billion to create an investment fund, more than $6 billion for large-scale research challenges, and a build-up of biomanufacturing sites across the country. Also, it calls for new legislation barring companies that work with U.S. national security agencies or health agencies from using certain Chinese biotech suppliers. The commission doesn’t have the power to authorize any changes but can make recommendations and advise members of Congress. BIO issued a statement in support.